Qodo is an AI code review tool giving teams deep codebase context to move faster across pull requests, editor workflows, and security-related checks. The public pages describe agents on each pull request, rules learned from the codebase and past reviews, a map of how repositories relate, and a credit pool rather than a permanent free seat. An admin installs it on a git host. Engineers are not required to create their own Qodo accounts.
Official website · www.qodo.ai
Choose Qodo when the hard step is reviewing changes people and coding agents already open. Install paths are listed for GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, and Gerrit. Pro Team covers up to 30 users. SSO, on-premises hosting, bring-your-own keys, Gerrit support, and the self-learning system are marked Enterprise. The homepage states that the Pro Team plan is credit-based at $0.012 per credit, pooled across the team. A Pro Team heading of $30 sits beside separate credit quantities, without a sentence that ties the heading to one pack.
Specialized agents run on every pull request, surfacing real bugs, rule violations, and requirement gaps with full codebase context. The homepage says they reason over the codebase. The docs index calls the same job automated review on every pull request, with bugs, standards, and context-aware feedback. It reads structure, dependencies, past diffs, comments, fixed issues, tickets, and specs. Wisdom Base names codebase knowledge, PR history, and business requirements. Cross-repo review looks for breaking changes before they reach other repos. Languages and a confidence cutoff are not listed.
Official documentationSelf-learning rules are described as machine-readable standards for developers, reviewers, and agents, learned from patterns, conventions, and architectural decisions in the codebase and pull-request history. You can monitor violations and how often issues are resolved before merge. Conflicts and decay are described as surfaced before they erode trust. An unlimited rules system and cross-repo capabilities are on Pro Team and Enterprise. Self-learning is Enterprise only. Standards learned from review decisions stay visible so they can be changed.
Official documentationPR Triage puts every agent-opened pull request into one team queue, with an owner on each. A claim holds that ownership to one reviewer at a time. Releasing it resumes the original clock. The pull request shows findings, checks, dependencies, and blast radius. Software Map draws the blast radius before a change lands and heat-maps where findings pile up. Relationships are rebuilt as each pull request lands. Named counts cover severity, findings that changed code before merge, and IDE catches. Sample percentages were not verified here.
Official documentationThe docs index lists install pages for GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, and Gerrit. An admin signs in with GitHub, Google, or email, and a card is required only for a paid plan. Engineers do not need accounts. Repositories are unlimited, and Pro Team supports up to 30 users. Flagged code can be fixed in the editor. The toolbox is a command-line counterpart for agents including Codex, Claude, and Kiro, and can run in your environment with your own key. On-prem hosting, single-tenant SaaS, and Gerrit support are marked Enterprise. Open source model support such as Nemotron is named on that page.
Official documentationInstall on those repositories, let trial reviews run, and read findings beside the diff. The enterprise page describes one queue and ownership that stays with a single reviewer until the claim is released. Keep a person on the merge and use the software map when a shared service is involved. The pages do not say a flag blocks merge.
Platform groups with conventions buried in wikis have a suggested way to see whether Qodo’s rules match how they already review. Start with one service other repos call, match violations to what reviewers reject, and use cross-repo review before a breaking change lands downstream. Cross-repo capabilities are marked on Pro Team. The self-learning system, SSO, and an on-premises context engine are marked Enterprise. Reads that table; it is not a migration carried out here.
Maintainers of a public repository have a suggested path that is not the ordinary team trial. Qualified open source projects can apply to the Qodo for Open Source program for free access. The same FAQ says there is no permanent free tier, so a paid plan keeps reviews running after the trial. The application is a request. Eligibility, duration, and private forks are not listed. A private monorepo belongs with Pro Team credit terms.
Sign in with GitHub, Google, or email. A credit card is required only when you choose a paid plan.
Install Qodo from the documented git-provider path. Admin access is required, and reviews start once the install is in place.
Open the pull-request review for bugs, rule violations, and requirement gaps, or fix flagged code in the editor before the pull request exists.
Reviews pause when the trial ends until you choose a plan. Pack changes made in the dashboard take effect on the next billing cycle.
The pricing page shows a Free 14 Day Trial with unlimited reviews and credits and no credit card, a Pro Team heading of $30 and an Enterprise custom plan for 30 or more users. The homepage says the Pro Team plan is credit-based at $0.012 per credit, pooled across the team. Pack labels are 2,500 credits for about 18 reviews a month, 5,000 for about 36, and 20,000 for about 144. No sentence ties the $30 heading to one of those packs.
Teams of up to 30 users reviewing shared repositories.
$30.
Monthly credit pack; no annual commitment stated.
Organizations that need the controls marked Enterprise-only.
Not verified.
Custom plan for 30+ users.
Every code review draws credits from your monthly pool. Smaller PRs draw fewer credits, larger or more complex reviews draw more. Credits expire each monthly cycle. Overage then uses the same per-credit rate until a cap you set pauses reviews. Raising the cap resumes them. We don’t offer a permanent free tier. Qualified open source projects can apply for free access. An Enterprise price was not verified here.
You are comparing in-editor automation, not pull-request governance.
These Qodo pages describe credit-metered review and an Enterprise tier, not Tabnine’s editor behavior.
We don’t offer a permanent free tier. After the trial you pick a paid plan to keep reviewing. The Free 14 Day Trial includes unlimited reviews and credits and no credit card, then reviews pause until a plan is chosen. The dashboard suggests a pack from trial volume. Qualified open source projects can apply for free access.
SourceEvery code review draws credits from your monthly pool. Smaller pull requests draw fewer credits, and the dashboard shows balance and burn rate. Unused credits expire with the monthly cycle. Overage then runs at the same per-credit rate, with no premium, until a cap you set pauses reviews. The homepage rate is $0.012 per credit. Pack labels estimate about 18, 36, or 144 reviews. A fixed cost per review is not guaranteed.
SourceAn admin signs in with GitHub, Google, or email and installs Qodo. Engineers do not need accounts. Repositories are unlimited, and review volume follows the credit pool. The trial allows unlimited users. Pro Team supports up to 30, and Enterprise is the heading for larger teams. Pack changes apply on the next billing cycle. Pro Team states monthly billing, no annual commitment, and no rate limits.
SourcePro Team includes agentic pull-request review, an unlimited rules system, git and IDE integrations, shift-left skills, strict data retention, cross-repo capabilities, a dashboard, and standard support. Self-learning, custom workflows, Gerrit support, advanced analytics, SSO / SAML, audit logs, bring-your-own keys, single-tenant or on-prem deployment, priority support, a dedicated CSM, and annual contracts are marked Enterprise. The docs index still lists a Gerrit install page beside that gate.
SourceThe homepage says it takes security, privacy and compliance seriously, then lists zero data retention, SOC 2 Type II certified, on-premises deployment, and single-tenant deployment. Strict data retention is marked on Pro Team and Enterprise. The enterprise page says the context engine and toolbox can run inside your environment and calls the offering SOC2-ready with zero external data exposure.
SourceOct 6, 2026 · NavHunt editorial
NavHunt did not run Qodo, did not install it on a repository, and did not open a pull request for review. This profile restates the homepage, pricing page, enterprise page, and documentation index reviewed on 6 October 2026. Credit burn, review quality, and deployment behavior were not measured. This description is based on Qodo's official materials reviewed on 2026-10-06, including AI Code Review – Qodo: Deploy with confidence, Qodo Plans & Pricing | Free to Start, Agentic AI for Enterprise SDLC | Qodo, Qodo documentation index.
An admin signs in, connects a git host, and reviews run until the trial ends.